Introduction
Have you ever wondered whether you should use 被害を受ける (higai o ukeru / to suffer harm or damage) or 損害を受ける (songai o ukeru / to suffer a loss)?
These two expressions are easy to confuse because both describe negative consequences caused by an event.
For example, after a typhoon damages a house, you may hear both:
台風で被害を受けた。
The area or property suffered damage from the typhoon.
and:
台風で損害を受けた。
It suffered losses from the typhoon.
So, are they interchangeable?
Not quite.
被害を受ける focuses broadly on being negatively affected by something such as a natural disaster, accident, or crime.
損害を受ける, on the other hand, tends to focus on a concrete loss involving property, money, business, equipment, or other assets.
Because the meanings overlap, simply memorizing both as “to suffer damage” can easily lead to unnatural Japanese.
Let’s start with some common mistakes and see how native Japanese usage differs.
A Common Mistake
Consider this sentence:
私はインターネットで詐欺に遭い、大きな損害を受けました。
I was scammed online and suffered a major loss.
This sentence is not grammatically wrong.
If you want to emphasize the money or property you lost, 損害を受けました is perfectly possible.
However, if your main point is simply that you became a victim of a scam, Japanese speakers would more naturally say:
私はインターネット詐欺の被害を受けました。
I was a victim of an online scam.
Now consider another example:
台風によって、多くの住民が損害を受けました。
Many residents suffered losses because of the typhoon.
The meaning is understandable, but if you are talking broadly about people being affected by the disaster, this is more natural:
台風によって、多くの住民が被害を受けました。
Many residents were affected by the typhoon.
損害 is more strongly associated with concrete losses involving things such as houses, cars, goods, property, company revenue, and other assets.
Why Does It Sound Unnatural?
The confusion comes from an important similarity.
Both 被害 (higai / harm, damage, victimization) and 損害 (songai / damage, loss) refer to negative consequences.
However, they look at those consequences from slightly different angles.
被害 is commonly used when talking about situations such as:
- someone being injured
- someone becoming a victim of crime
- people being affected by a natural disaster
- buildings or communities being damaged
- crops or animals being harmed
In other words, 被害 focuses broadly on the harmful effects of an undesirable event.
損害 is more likely to be used when talking about:
- damaged houses or cars
- unusable products
- money that has been lost
- reduced company revenue
- damage to property or equipment
- losses caused to a business
It therefore has a stronger connection with losses that can be identified, evaluated, or sometimes expressed in monetary terms.
This is also why Japanese commonly uses expressions such as:
損害額 (songai-gaku / amount of loss)
損害賠償 (songai baishō / compensation for damages)
経済的損害 (keizaiteki songai / economic loss)
A useful way to remember the distinction is:
被害 focuses on the harmful effects of an event.
損害 focuses on the concrete loss resulting from that event.
More Natural Japanese
Let’s correct the earlier examples.
Talking About Crime
A sentence that may sound slightly unnatural depending on your intended meaning:
私はインターネット詐欺で損害を受けました。
I suffered a loss from an online scam.
This works if you specifically want to emphasize financial loss.
But if you simply mean that you were a victim of fraud, a more natural sentence is:
私はインターネット詐欺の被害を受けました。
I was a victim of an online scam.
Japanese very commonly uses combinations such as:
詐欺の被害 (sagi no higai / damage or victimization caused by fraud)
盗難の被害 (tōnan no higai / damage caused by theft)
犯罪の被害 (hanzai no higai / harm caused by crime)
Talking About People Affected by a Disaster
A less natural choice in a general description:
地震で多くの住民が損害を受けました。
Many residents suffered losses in the earthquake.
A more natural expression is:
地震で多くの住民が被害を受けました。
Many residents were affected by the earthquake.
Here, we are talking broadly about the negative effects experienced by people, so 被害 is the more natural choice.
However, if you focus on specific damage to property, 損害 becomes natural:
地震によって建物に大きな損害が出ました。
The earthquake caused major damage to the buildings.
The Basic Difference Between 被害 and 損害
被害を受ける
被害を受ける (higai o ukeru / to suffer harm, damage, or victimization) broadly describes being negatively affected by an accident, crime, disaster, or similar event.
It can be used for people, objects, communities, agricultural products, and many other things.
Common expressions include:
- 台風の被害を受ける
- 地震の被害を受ける
- 詐欺の被害を受ける
- 盗難の被害を受ける
- 洪水の被害を受ける
The key idea is that something has suffered harmful effects.
Those effects do not need to be expressed in money.
Physical injury, disruption to daily life, psychological harm, destruction, and other negative consequences can all be described as 被害.
損害を受ける
損害を受ける (songai o ukeru / to suffer damage or a loss) usually describes a more concrete loss involving property, money, equipment, goods, or business activities.
It is often used with subjects such as:
- companies
- property
- buildings
- products
- equipment
- businesses
損害 is also somewhat more formal and is frequently found in news reports, business writing, insurance, and legal contexts.
It often makes us think about questions such as:
“How much was lost?”
“What was damaged?”
“How serious was the financial loss?”
Learn the Difference Through Examples
Example 1
この地域は去年の台風で大きな被害を受けた。
This area suffered severe damage from last year’s typhoon.
被害 is natural because the sentence refers broadly to the impact on the whole area.
Houses may have been damaged, roads may have become unusable, and power may have been cut off.
All of these effects can be included under 被害.
Example 2
大雨によって多くの農家が被害を受けた。
Many farmers were badly affected by the heavy rain.
被害 is natural because the farmers were broadly affected by the disaster.
Their crops, farmland, equipment, or income may all have been affected.
Example 3
その会社はサイバー攻撃によって大きな損害を受けた。
The company suffered major losses because of a cyberattack.
Here, 損害 is natural because the sentence suggests concrete losses to the business.
The company may have lost sales, paid recovery costs, or suffered damage to its systems.
Example 4
火事によって建物は大きな損害を受けた。
The building suffered major damage in the fire.
The building is an asset, and the fire caused concrete physical damage to it.
Therefore, 損害 works naturally here.
Example 5
彼女は悪質な詐欺の被害を受けた。
She became a victim of a malicious scam.
Because the focus is on her being the victim of a crime, 被害 is the natural choice.
Japanese commonly uses expressions such as 詐欺被害, 犯罪被害, and 盗難被害.
Example 6
詐欺による金銭的な損害は100万円を超えた。
The financial loss caused by the fraud exceeded one million yen.
Here, the focus is not simply on becoming a victim.
The sentence specifically describes the amount of money that was lost.
That is why 損害 is more appropriate.
Compare:
詐欺の被害を受けた。
I was a victim of fraud.
with:
詐欺によって100万円の損害を受けた。
I suffered a loss of one million yen because of the fraud.
In the first sentence, the focus is on being affected by the crime.
In the second, the focus is on the amount of money lost.
Example 7
地震で多くの人が被害を受けた。
Many people were affected by the earthquake.
They may have been injured, lost their homes, or had to live in evacuation shelters.
The sentence refers broadly to the effects on people, so 被害 is natural.
Example 8
地震による経済的な損害は数千億円に達した。
The economic losses caused by the earthquake reached hundreds of billions of yen.
Here, the loss is being measured in money.
損害 is therefore the natural choice.
When deciding between 被害を受ける and 損害を受ける, ask yourself:
Are we focusing on what happened to the people, place, or thing?
Or are we focusing on what was actually lost?
That question will often lead you to the correct expression.
How JLPT Questions Can Trick You
被害 and 損害 are exactly the kind of similar words that can cause trouble in JLPT vocabulary and reading questions.
Because their meanings overlap, both options may seem possible at first.
For example:
大雨のため、多くの住民が___を受けた。
Because of the heavy rain, many residents suffered ______.
The natural answer is:
被害
The sentence broadly describes residents being negatively affected by the heavy rain.
Now consider:
工場の停止による会社の___は数億円に達した。
The company’s ______ caused by the factory shutdown reached several hundred million yen.
Here, the answer is:
損害
The phrase 数億円に達した tells us that the sentence is talking about a measurable financial loss.
In JLPT questions, do not look only at the target word.
Look carefully at the surrounding context.
If the sentence focuses on:
- people being affected
- communities being affected
- natural disasters
- crimes and victims
被害 is often the stronger candidate.
If it focuses on:
- money
- property
- companies
- economic effects
- repair costs
- lost revenue
損害 is often more likely.
There are situations where both words are possible.
That is exactly why understanding the focus of the sentence is more useful than simply memorizing dictionary translations.
Summary
被害を受ける and 損害を受ける both describe negative consequences, but their focus is different.
- 被害を受ける broadly describes harmful effects caused by disasters, accidents, crimes, and similar events.
- 損害を受ける tends to describe concrete losses involving money, property, equipment, or business.
- When people are affected by a disaster or crime, 被害 is often natural.
- When financial or material losses are emphasized, 損害 is often natural.
- In some situations, both expressions are possible, depending on what the speaker wants to emphasize.
To use similar Japanese words naturally, knowing their English translation is not enough.
You also need to understand what kind of situation they are used in and what part of that situation the speaker is focusing on.
This ability is especially important for JLPT vocabulary and reading questions, where several choices may appear to have almost the same meaning.
RJT (Rapid Japanese Training) helps you build this kind of practical Japanese sense through JLPT vocabulary, grammar, reading, and listening practice.
If you often find yourself thinking, “I understand all the choices, but I still don’t know which one is correct,” practicing with real question patterns can help you recognize the subtle differences that matter.